R (O) v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2011] EWHC 679 (Admin)(Blair J): although the local authority’s decision-making process had been lawful in the main, its conclusion, despite changed circumstances, that O should not be placed at a residential school with a 24-hour/52-week curriculum had been irrational and required to be reconsidered. Click here for the transcript.
- About
- Barristers
- Clerks & Staff
- Areas of Law
- Administrative and Public Law
- Children's Rights
- Civil Liberties and Human Rights
- Claims Against the Police and Public Authorities
- Immigration Detention Civil Claims
- Inquests and Inquiries
- Prisoners’ Rights
- Protest Rights
- Commercial and Business Ethics
- Community Care Law
- Court of Protection
- Criminal Defence
- Criminal Appeals
- Financial Crime and Confiscation
- Protest Rights
- Youth Justice & Child Rights
- Education Law
- School Inclusion Project (SIP)
- Employment and Discrimination Law
- Environmental Law and Climate Justice
- Climate Change and Fossil Fuel Production
- Pollution
- Rights of Nature and Protection of Habitats
- Environmental Impact Assessments
- Environmental Protest
- Family Law
- Children Law
- Divorce and Family Finances
- Immigration and Family Law Crossover
- International Family Law
- Domestic Abuse
- Garden Court International
- International Crime and Conflict Law
- International Environmental Law
- International Family Law
- International Human Rights
- Migration and Asylum Law
- Public International Law
- Housing Law
- Immigration Law
- Immigration Detention, Asylum and Deportation
- Immigration and Family Law Crossover
- Immigration: Personal and Business
- British Citizenship and Naturalisation
- Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC)
- Settlement (Indefinite Leave to Remain)
- Visas
- Mediation
- Mental Health Law
- National Security and Closed Material Procedures
- Planning Law
- Property Disputes
- Protest Rights
- Romani Gypsy and Traveller Rights
- Welfare Benefits Law
- Public Access
- News & Blogs
- Events
- Join Us
- Contact
