CJEU decision in Bajratari v SSHD(Case 93/18)

Thursday 24 October 2019

Gráinne Mellon and Ronan Toal of Garden Court acted successfully on behalf of the Aire Centre who were intervenors in the case of Bajarati v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] ECR 1.

Share This Page

Email This Page

On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered an important decision in Bajratari v SSHD, clarifying the ‘sufficient resources’ condition of Article 7(1)(b) Directive 2004/38 whilst simultaneously reinforcing the right to free movement of Union citizens. Gráinne Mellon and Ronan Toal of Garden Court acted on behalf of the AIRE Centre, who intervened in both the Northern Irish Court of Appeal and the CJEU proceedings.

The case concerned the right of a third-country national mother of two minor Union citizens to reside in Northern Ireland in her capacity as their primary carer. The UK authorities had found that the mother could not claim a derived right of residence as the children did not fulfil the requirements set out in Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38. This places two conditions on Union citizens who claim a right of residence in a host Member State for a period longer than three months namely having; (i) sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden on the host state’s social assistance system, and (ii) comprehensive sickness insurance cover.

The UK authorities argued that the requirement for sufficient resources was not met on the facts of this case, as the father’s income derived from employment carried out unlawfully after the expiry of his residence card and work permit (though he was still paying tax and social contributions on the income he received during this period).

The CJEU however, following the Advocate General’s opinion, rejected the UK authorities arguments. It held that a Union child fulfils the requirement of having sufficient resources, even if those resources come from income gained through ‘unlawful’ employment (paras. 48 and 53). This was in line with the wording of Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38, and the principle of proportionality. In its judgment, the Court recognised the importance of the distinction between employment without a lawful work permit, and money gained from say illegal/criminal activities.

Gráinne Mellon and Ronan Toal acted on behalf of the Aire Centre with Monye Anyadike Danes QC and Aidan O’Neill QC of Matrix Chambers. They were instructed by Phoenix Law Belfast.

 Gráinne and Ronan are members of the Garden Court Chambers Immigration Team

Related News

Related Areas of Law

Latest tweets from Garden Court Chambers

Follow us on Twitter

Tweets by gardencourtlaw

We are top ranked by independent legal directories and consistently win awards

+ View more awards