Abigail is an experienced specialist in asylum and immigration law who is regularly instructed in a wide range of cases at all levels. She offers a high success rate coupled with a user-friendly approach.
Abigail is an immigration and asylum specialist who regularly appears at all levels in a range of matters. In her practice, Abigail draws on experience gained whilst working for solicitors firms and various NGOs. Abigail appears frequently before the Upper Tribunal and First-Tier Tribunal in all areas of immigration law, including refugee, human rights, family, EEA, student, business immigration, bail and deportation cases.
She continues to develop her practice and enjoys frequent success offering a reliable and effective service to both lay and professional clients.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica)  EWCA Civ 2112
In the context of remitting a deportation appeal to the FTT the Court of Appeal held that the test for internal relocation in Januzi was intentionally left broad to include all the relevant circumstances about both the country and the person, including their criminality. The Court confirmed that the plain meaning of "most of his life" for the purpose of para.339A(a) of the Rules was "more than half" and "lawful residence" ran from the date of application for refugee status.
AT and another (Article 8 ECHR - Child Refugee - Family Reunification) Eritrea  UKUT 227 (IAC)
The UT held that while the Immigration Rules make no provision for family reunification in the case of a child who has been granted asylum, a refusal to permit the family members of such child to enter and remain may constitute a disproportionate breach of the right to respect for family life under Article 8 ECHR.
BM and Others (returnees - criminal and non-criminal) DRC CG  293 (IAC)
Country Guidance case on criminal and non-criminal returns to the DRC.
RK (Deportation: basis of plea) Albania  UKUT 84 (IAC)
The UT confirmed that where a deportation decision is based solely on a conviction following a plea of guilty, it is not for a Tribunal to reach its own view of the facts underlying a conviction based on a basis of plea save perhaps in very exceptional circumstances.
MJ (Angola) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 557, 20 May 2010
The lead case on (a) deportation of persons subject to restrictions under Mental Health Act and (b) need for "very serious reasons" for deportation of persons who grow up in the UK (cf Maslov v Austria  ECHR 546).
VW (Uganda) & AB (Somalia) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 5, 16 January 2009
The Court of Appeal took the important step of putting an end to the misapplication of the so-called "insurmountable obstacles" test from Lord Phillips' judgment in Mahmood  1 WLR 840 CA in assessing proportionality under s.2 Article 8.
RS (Zimbabwe) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 839, 18 July 2008
This was a successful Court of Appeal challenge for a Zimbabwean woman with HIV post N HoL and ECtHR.
FK (Democratic Republic of Congo) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 1545, 14 December 2007
The Court of Appeal considered proportionality under Article 8 in the context of a lengthy delay by SSHD and allowed the appeal
Abigail practises in prison law where her work includes judicial reviews, hearings before the Parole Board and advising prisoners on a wide range of matters.
R (Modhej) v Secretary of State for Justice  EWHC 2267 (Admin), 28 August 2011
The High Court considered the complex issue of the calculation of release dates for extended sentence prisoners.
R (Hewlett) v Secretary of State for Justice  EWHC 2979 (Admin), 16 November 2009
This was a challenge to an Incentives and Earned Privileges (IEP) downgrade for a prisoner maintaining his innocence.