Employment and discrimination
Catrin specialises in all aspects of employment law. She has particular expertise in race, sex, and disability discrimination cases and was regularly instructed in cases supported by the Commission for Racial Equality, Equal Opportunities Commission and the Disability Rights Commission and is now instructed in cases supported by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Catrin has many years of experience across the full range of employment, equality and discrimination including employment status; whistleblowing; TUPE; fixed-term workers regulations; and unfair dismissal. Catrin represents clients across the broad spectrum of discrimination cases including claims involving race, religion, disability, sex and pregnancy discrimination and sexual harassment, securing substantial compensation on behalf of claimants.
Catrin is an elected member of the Discrimination Law Association (DLA) Executive Committee and regularly speaks and provides training on behalf of the DLA.
Catrin was appointed as a Fee Paid Employment Judge in 2009 and regularly sits at the East London Employment Tribunal.
Court of Protection
Catrin has considerable experience of acting for vulnerable clients over many years through her employment and discrimination practice; her work with vulnerable clients has led her into Court of Protection work. Catrin now regularly appears in the Court of Protection and has represented in a range of cases. These include but are not limited to personal welfare applications; Section 21A applications challenging authorisations of deprivation of liberty in a care home or hospital under the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS); contested applications for the appointment of deputies (welfare/financial affairs), and other property and affairs applications; proceedings arising out of Care Orders under the Children Act 1989 and the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court.
Catrin is a CMC accredited mediator having trained as a mediator in 2007 and has experience of mediating in a wide variety of civil disputes.
Catrin worked at Hackney Community Law Centre for seven years before joining Chambers in 2000. Her experience of working in the voluntary sector informs her approach to many of her cases. Whilst at the Law Centre Catrin was a member of the local Community Legal Services Partnership and has extensive experience of the particular funding issues related to the voluntary sector and Legal Services Commission (LSC) contracting.
Catrin advised on Chambers’ LSC funded CallCounsel employment advice line and Counsel’s Advice written advice scheme for 8 years until the LSC funding was withdrawn, the service covered the full range of employment law queries from unfair dismissals to discrimination claims. She has always had a strong commitment to claimant-based work and regularly carries out pro bono work. Catrin also provides training to solicitors and voluntary sector advisers in employment law.
Catrin has been a long-standing member of the Haldane Society’s Employment Law sub-committee, whose activities include campaigning, briefing and lobbying on all aspects of employment rights both collective and individual, and also in providing training to trade unions including the FBU and RMT.
Catrin is a former Chair of the Haldane Society and for many years was editor of Socialist Lawyer magazine.
In addition she is a contributor to Liberty’s “Your Rights” on line service on discrimination law; the TUC’s Your Rights at Work; and LexisNexis PSL service on Public Sector Equality Duties
Andreou v Lord Chancellor Department  IRLR 728 CA (Adjournment of Employment Tribunal hearing, proof of illness, nature of medical evidence required)
Mallon v Corus Constructions and Industrial UK Ltd, EAT/857/02 Arrangements for determining whom to employ. On the true construction of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 s.4(1)(a), the fact of premature termination of an interview was as much part of the arrangements within that section as the conducting of the interview or a refusal to interview at all.
MacCulloch and Wallis Ltd v Moore EAT IDS Brief 740
Section 57A Employment Rights Act 1996 Dependant Care leave-notice provisions
Hudson v University of Oxford UKEAT/0488/05, UKEAT/0142/06
Tribunal Chairman sitting alone ought not to have struck out claims for unfair dismissal and whistleblowing; also held without prejudice correspondence admissible in support of whistleblowing claim due to unambiguous impropriety and because not part of a genuine attempt to settle dispute.
Claridge v Daler Rowney Ltd UKEAT/0188/08/CEA
Following Abbey National plc v Fairbrother  IRLR 320, even where the Tribunal concluded that in its view the employer has acted unreasonably, that is not of itself necessarily enough to establish a constructive dismissal. In a case like this where the alleged breach results from a course of conduct, the question is whether the conduct fell outside the range of reasonable responses. In relation to grievance procedures, Fairbrother was not in conflict with W A Goold (Pearmark) Ltd v McConnell & Ors  IRLR 516. A hearing will be sufficiently prompt if in all the circumstances a reasonable employer could have conducted the procedure as the Respondent employer did. Further, the grievance procedure must be looked at as a whole and should not be broken down into stages.
R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police  3 All ER 57 QBD Travellers: Police powers to require trespassers to leave land, whether direction requiring trespassers to leave land valid if not giving trespassers the opportunity to comply with occupier’s request for them to leave, whether direction to leave land valid if requires them to leave at a future time
Other cases of interest
- Successful victimisation claims for a number of Muslim workers who brought claims against their employers under the Religion or Belief Regulations
- Obtaining over £120,000 and costs in a sexual harassment claim
- Representing the successful claimant in a claim for discrimination and victimisation on grounds of gender reassignment in respect of the provision of a reference;
- Advising the claimant’s union (ATL) on behalf of their member who was a housemistress at an independent school in her successful claim for failure to pay the minimum wage.