Areas of PracticeStephen's practice focuses on individual rights in four discrete areas. These are civil claims against the police and public authorities; inquests; mental health; public law and judicial review. In particular, he specialises in claims for false imprisonment, assault, malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office against the police, prison authorities and psychiatric hospitals. Stephen is highly- experienced in trials in this area, and frequently conducts High Court and County Court trials in these claims. He has brought a number of claims in these areas where damages are claimed under the Human Rights Act 1998. He was also successful in obtaining compensation in a case before the European Court of Human Rights concerning forcible entry by the police. Stephen is a specialist in inquests into deaths in police and prison custody and into deaths in hospital, having represented families at inquests for many years. He also conducts complex hearings before the Mental Health Review Tribunal, including restricted patients, along with associated judicial review. His judicial review work is primarily within the substantive areas of mental health and community care, education, prisoners' rights and the rights of gypsies and travellers. He has also wide experience in judicial review arising out of criminal proceedings, proceedings involving ASBOs and coroners' inquests.
Stephen is also experienced in representing protestors in cases involving court injunctions taken out by commercial organisations against protestors.
Stephen is recommended by Chambers and Partners (top- ranked) and the Legal 500 in the areas in which he practises. He is a former nominee for the awards of Liberty Young Human Rights Lawyer of the Year and (now that he is old) the Liberty Human Rights Lawyer of the Year. BackgroundStephen came to the Bar after conducting research in European Community and employment law in Italy, where he lived for over a year. He has reasonably fluent conversational Italian. PublicationsIn addition to conducting training in mental health law, police actions and inquests, Stephen is a frequent contributor to Legal Action, Solicitors' Journal and other periodicals. Past articles include principles for obtaining compensation for police negligence, the role of the nearest relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 and developments on the case- law relating to neglect verdicts at coroners' inquests. He is also an editor of the Community Care Law Reports. Honours Squire Law Scholarship (University of Cambridge); Major and Duke of Edinburgh Scholarships (Inner Temple). SocietiesMIND Legal Network, INQUEST Lawyers' Group, Police Actions Lawyers' Group, Administrative Law Bar Association. Representative reported cases include:Judicial review in criminal proceedings & ASBO'sR v Crown Court at Maidstone ex parte Schulz [1993] COD 182 (while still a pupil, successfully obtaining judicial review of custody time limits extension); R v Highgate Justices ex parte Riley [1996] COD 12 (quashing a summary trial due to a magistrate's bias);
R (application P) v Barking Youth Court (2002) 2 Cr. App. R 19 (overturning a finding that a young defendant was fit to plead and stand trial) R (application D) v Camberwell Green Youth Court [2005] 1 WLR 393 ( House of Lords case involving challenge to the special measures directions and use of video evidence in trials of young defendants) R (application D) v Sheffield Youth Court (2003) 167 JP 159 (successfully challenging committal decisions by youth courts of committal of children for crown court trial)
R (application of C ) v Sunderland Youth Court [2004] 1 Cr App R (S) 76 (successfully quashing ASBO made against a child)
R (Mills) v Birmingham Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC Admin 2732 (successfully quashing an ASBO made following a shoplifting conviction)
Gibson, Kelly and Bailey v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA CIv 177 (failing to procure release of prisoner affected by the drafting errors in the legislation relating to early release from prison)
Mental health cases
re Briscoe [1998] COD 402 (successful habeas corpus application in relation to improperly detained psychiatric patient); R (on application of C) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] 1 WLR 176 (overturning a practice by which patients had to wait excessive times for a Mental Health Review Tribunal hearing);
R (application of T) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] 1 MHLR 275 (upholding the right of a victim of an offence to receive some information about the discharge plans of a patient)
R (application of CS) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] 1 MHLR 355 (concerning the powers of the Mental Health Review Tribunal in relation to discharge of patients on long- term leave of absence)
R (application SSG) v Liverpool City Council (2002) 5 Community Care LR 639 (successfully brought proceedings enabling same sex cohabitants to be treated the same as heterosexual couples for the purposes of being recognized as nearest relative under the Mental Health Act)
R (on application of MM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 1 MHLR 304 (Court of Appeal case concerning Home Secretary's powers to recall conditionally-discharged patients to hospital)
Judicial review involving gypsies and travellers
Ward v London Borough of Hillingdon (2001) HRLR 825, (2001) LGR 457 (eviction from a travellers' site); R (application Piggott) v Bedfordshire County Council (Times LR 29/1/2002) (successfully quashing a council's refusal to allow a trespassing traveller a plot on a travellers' site);
Judicial review involving inquests
R v HM Coroner for Swansea ex parte Chief Constable of South Wales (2000) 164 JP 191(judicial review where an inquest jury's verdict of neglect following death in custody was challenged. The new inquest returned a verdict incorporating neglect); R v HM Coroner for Coventry ex parte Chief Constable of Staffordshire (2000) 164 JP 665 (successfully upholding an inquest jury's verdict of neglect following death in custody) R (on application of Scott) v HM Coroner for Inner West London (2001) 165 JP 417, (2001) 61 BMLR 222 (obtaining a new inquest where a psychiatric patient detained in prison had been allowed to hang himself and the issue of "neglect" had not been considered. The new inquest ordered returned a verdict incorporating "neglect")
R (on application of Cash) v HM Coroner for Northamptonshire [2007] 1 Inquest LR 154 (successful application for judicial review of coroner's failure to leave verdict of unlawful killing and failure to leave narrative verdict, resulting in a fresh inquest being ordered) Claims against the policeKeegan v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2003] 1 WLR 2187 (appeal raising ambit of tort of malicious procurement of search warrant in circumstances where no human rights claim could be brought. Resulted in successful Strasbourg claim).
R (application of Wilkinson) v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2004] 1 Pol LR 189 (quashing a police force's refusal to conduct an investigation into a complaint) R (application of Clare) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2005] 1 Pol LR 185 (upholding the complainant's right to have an investigation by establishing that IPCC is permitted to withdraw a dispensation from requirement to investigate complaint) Chief Constable of Merseyside v Ali Daar [2005] EWCA 1774, [2005] 1 Pol LR 376 (preventing police striking out claim against police on basis that claimant had received an ASBO) Paul v Chief Constable of Humberside Police [2004] EWCA Civ 308, [2004] 1 Pol LR 179 (successful appeal establishing that claims for damages against the police will often depend on inferences being drawn against police evidence)
Keegan v United Kingdom [2007] 44 EHRR 33 (obtaining compensation from European Court of Human Rights for breach of ECHR Article 8 and Article 13 following police search) Other significant casesMalik v Selfridges [1998] ICR 268 (appeal where employer had refused to comply with an order for reinstatement and tribunal ordered additional compensation);
Farah v Home Office Times LR 26/1/2000 (successfully appealed the striking out of a claim against Home Office relating to Somali family being detained and stranded abroad due to incorrect information about their immigration status being given by Home Office to airline) EDO MBM Technology and others v Axworthy and others[2005] EWHC 837 (QB) (establishing that it is necessary for someone seeking injunction against unincorporated association to identify those whom it proceeds against).
Heathrow Airport and others v Garman and others [2007] EWHC 1957 (QB) (preventing wide- ranging injunction that would have allowed arrest of anyone opposed to airport expansion). InterestsStephen is interested in alternative energy projects. His belief in hope over experience results in his active support of Nottingham Forest FC. He also plays the violin (badly) in an amateur orchestra and is learning to play bluegrass and Balkan gypsy music on the mandolin, being a member of the London Gypsy Orchestra.
|
